{"created":"2023-05-15T12:05:42.408319+00:00","id":81,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"d03e78a1-fc49-4b3c-bccf-c0caef9d6e09"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"81","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"81"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:mukogawa.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000081","sets":["245:260"]},"author_link":["5643"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2011-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"91","bibliographicPageStart":"87","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"58","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"武庫川女子大学紀要. 人文・社会科学編"}]}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Here, I pointed out that the number of questionnaire surveys in the style of mailing questionnaires was likely to be increasing regardless of academic fields. There exists an issue which has not been previously recognized, that you might call“ examination of questionnaire surveys”. Traditionally, the response to the question of whether or not questionnaires could be approved as scientific survey methods was convincing to a certain extent. If increasing recognition of privacy makes home-visit or interview-type social surveys difficult, resulting in an increase in straightforward questionnaire surveys in which other methods such as observational or experimental methods are not discussed, and, in addition, if investigators pay no attention to the heavy burden on responders associated with the above increase, recovery rate reduction will occur widely, threatening questionnaire survey credibility as well as its utility as a research tool. Researchers should make the results of questionnaires widely known to the public and reflect on their social importance, not simply considering only academic accomplishments to be the purpose of surveys.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.14993/00000075","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_10002_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN10187266","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0916-3115","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"大西, 次郎"},{"creatorName":"オオニシ, ジロウ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"},{"creatorName":"OHNISHI, Jiro","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2017-09-25"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"P087-091.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"979.4 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"P087-091.pdf","url":"https://mukogawa.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/81/files/P087-091.pdf"},"version_id":"1c20efc3-f07c-4ea2-9acf-08f362b6db1f"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"「調査法としてのアンケート」における問題点","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"「調査法としてのアンケート」における問題点"},{"subitem_title":"Key Issues in Questionnaires as Survey Methods","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"3","path":["260"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2012-04-16"},"publish_date":"2012-04-16","publish_status":"0","recid":"81","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["「調査法としてのアンケート」における問題点"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":3},"updated":"2023-05-15T13:13:52.906439+00:00"}