WEKO3
アイテム
スウェーデンの年金制度改革
https://doi.org/10.14993/00000231
https://doi.org/10.14993/00000231c5579bfc-c24a-4ebd-8638-daa90ff276b0
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| アイテムタイプ | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2009-07-03 | |||||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||||
| タイトル | スウェーデンの年金制度改革 | |||||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||||
| タイトル | Reformed Pension Scheme in Sweden | |||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.14993/00000231 | |||||||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||||||
| 著者 |
岡光, 昇
× 岡光, 昇
× Okamitsu, Noboru
|
|||||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||||
| 内容記述 | The purpose of this paper is to investigate the meanings and the problems of Reformed Pension Scheme in Sweden by making clear the features of the present pension systems. The present Swedish pension systems - the National Basic Pension and the National Supplementary Pension Scheme - were established a generation ago with the introduction of the Supplementary Pension Scheme in 1960. The pluralistic dynamism has brought the present pension systems in Sweden into the instability, the inequity, the distortion and the dualism. In 1990 the Commission presented the findings and proposals of the systems. Many considered that more far-reaching changes were necessary than those proposed by the Commission. The Working Group on Pension was therefor set up. In 1994, the bill containing guidelines for the reformed system was submitted to the Swedish Parliament. Parliament decided that these guidelines should form the basis for future reform. The features of the pension reform in Sweden have been formulated in following way: it is worthy of special mention to resume the contribution-payment of the employees and to take away financial difficulties by introducing the lifetime earning principle, the income index adjustment, the defined contribution scheme, and the coefficient of the average life expectancy. In this sense Sweden can obtain excellent results of the pension reform in 1998. But instead of the contribution-payment of the employees, the Swedish neo-corporatism guaranteed a wage increase, and can't lighten the burden of the employers. LO has gotten the advantage over the employers in the pluralistic society. | |||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 武庫川女子大学紀要. 人文・社会科学編 巻 47, p. 29-37, 発行日 2000-03-31 |
|||||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 武庫川女子大学 | |||||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0916-3115 | |||||||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10187266 | |||||||||||||