WEKO3
アイテム
Japanese University Students’ Order of Morpheme Acquisition
https://doi.org/10.14993/00001053
https://doi.org/10.14993/00001053212828a1-ee0e-4a5b-9ff7-c0c150ceec29
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2017-05-13 | |||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||
タイトル | Japanese University Students’ Order of Morpheme Acquisition | |||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
言語 | ||||||||||||
言語 | eng | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題URI | en | |||||||||||
主題 | grammatical morphemes | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題URI | en | |||||||||||
主題 | acquisition order | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題URI | en | |||||||||||
主題 | Krashen | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題URI | en | |||||||||||
主題 | Japanese learners of English | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
ID登録 | ||||||||||||
ID登録 | 10.14993/00001053 | |||||||||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||||
著者 |
西嶋, 久雄
× 西嶋, 久雄
|
|||||||||||
抄録 | ||||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
内容記述 | The purpose of this paper is to answer the following three research questions: First, if a learner of L2 is able to produce the target grammatical morpheme correctly in a given production test, is it safe to say that the learner has acquired the item? Second, to what extent is morpheme acquisition sequence, proposed by Krashen (1977), applicable to Japanese learners of English in a given context? Third, can the accuracy rate of morpheme acquisition improve if the pre-test is done at home rather than in class or if the feedback is provided after the pre-test? Grounded in the results, the author contends that a learner’s use of the correct form in one production test does not mean that the student has acquired its grammatical item. It has also become evident that the natural order of morpheme acquisition proposed by Krashen (1982) does not seem to hold for Japanese EFL students in question. An answer to the third question appears to be indeterminate since each group’s proficiency was not checked before the surveys were conducted, and thus there is a possibility that the differences in accuracy rates, and the degrees of improvement might be triggered by other reasons which have not been originally contemplated in framing the study. | |||||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 学校教育センター年報 巻 2, p. 9-20, 発行日 2017-03-01 |
|||||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||||
出版者 | 武庫川女子大学学校教育センター | |||||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||||
ISSN | ||||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
収録物識別子 | 2432-258X | |||||||||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
収録物識別子 | AA12749194 |